Quest Minerals & Mining Corp
WKN: A0RB98 / ISIN: US74835X4007QUEST MINERALS+MNG (WKN: A0M92C) Produktionsstart?
06.02.09 19:17
#2351
heshes
Mögliches O/S zum 2009-01-31: 525.329.587 ?!?!?
Ab 19:00 werden gerade zich 5000er Pakete zu 0,0013 "gekauft" ... bzw. ab 19:00 wurde komplett nur aus ASK geholt ... watt soll das?
Aber von wegen spielen ...
Wenn man folgendes zu Grunde legt:
"As of November 13, 2008, 142,449,309 shares of our common stock were outstanding."
Jetzt nehmen wir einmal an - dass alles, was seit dem letzt R/S gehandelt worde ist gleich Dilution ist (wovon wir wohl leider nach den schlechten Monatsberichten größteils ausgehen müssen!)
30.01.2009 Total Share Volume: 191.564.980
31.12.2008 Total Share Volume: 117.467.474
31.11.2008 Total Share Volume: 73.847.824
Zwischensumme: 382.880.278
Mögliches O/S zum 2009-01-31: 525.329.587
Aber von wegen spielen ...
Wenn man folgendes zu Grunde legt:
"As of November 13, 2008, 142,449,309 shares of our common stock were outstanding."
Jetzt nehmen wir einmal an - dass alles, was seit dem letzt R/S gehandelt worde ist gleich Dilution ist (wovon wir wohl leider nach den schlechten Monatsberichten größteils ausgehen müssen!)
30.01.2009 Total Share Volume: 191.564.980
31.12.2008 Total Share Volume: 117.467.474
31.11.2008 Total Share Volume: 73.847.824
Zwischensumme: 382.880.278
Mögliches O/S zum 2009-01-31: 525.329.587
07.02.09 17:56
#2352
evens
Hm, wenn man sich die
Verkäufe (rot) und Käufe (blau) ansieht!
http://de.advfn.com/p.php?pid=qkchart&cb=1234025482&symbol=NB%5EQMLM
Dann dürften die Verkäufe wohl ca. 2/3 der gehandelten Shares sein!
Ein paar Private dürften auch noch verkauft haben, vielleicht 10 Prozent der Gesamtverkäufe!
Ergibt dann bei 525 mal 2/3 mal 90% = ca. 315 Millionen shares!
bei grober Schätzung müssten die derzeitigen O/S zwischen 300 und 350 Millionen liegen!
Somit Marktkapitalisierung von ca. 400k Dollar. Luft nach oben wäre noch da! ;-)
http://de.advfn.com/p.php?pid=qkchart&cb=1234025482&symbol=NB%5EQMLM
Dann dürften die Verkäufe wohl ca. 2/3 der gehandelten Shares sein!
Ein paar Private dürften auch noch verkauft haben, vielleicht 10 Prozent der Gesamtverkäufe!
Ergibt dann bei 525 mal 2/3 mal 90% = ca. 315 Millionen shares!
bei grober Schätzung müssten die derzeitigen O/S zwischen 300 und 350 Millionen liegen!
Somit Marktkapitalisierung von ca. 400k Dollar. Luft nach oben wäre noch da! ;-)
09.02.09 22:22
#2353
Einszweidrei
Mein Gott,
wie lange wollt ihr den Mist noch mitmachen ?
Es gibt so schöne Werte wo man sich derzeit aufhalten kann......
grüße 123
Es gibt so schöne Werte wo man sich derzeit aufhalten kann......
grüße 123
10.02.09 12:31
#2354
Donpedromuc
bei den schönen Werten bin ich auch,
aber man darf doch auch über seine Leichen im Keller sprechen.
10.02.09 16:10
#2355
heshes
@2353 - mein Gott / dein Gott / unser Gott
Was sind Deine Beweggründe?
Was willst Du uns mit Deinem Posting sagen?!?
Warum schaust Du hier rein - wenn Dich der Wert nicht interessiert?!
Schön für Dich - dass Du auch schöne andere Werte meinst zu kennen ...
schön - dass wir darüber gesprochen haben ... darf ich die POG-Kerze jetzt wieder auspusten?
Was willst Du uns mit Deinem Posting sagen?!?
Warum schaust Du hier rein - wenn Dich der Wert nicht interessiert?!
Schön für Dich - dass Du auch schöne andere Werte meinst zu kennen ...
schön - dass wir darüber gesprochen haben ... darf ich die POG-Kerze jetzt wieder auspusten?
10.02.09 16:34
#2357
Einszweidrei
mein Gott
du bist auch noch Fan von der Bude, Beileid.
Ich war mal hier investiert und bin zu guten Kursen wieder raus.
Habe überlegt, steige aber aufgrund des Umfelds nicht mehr ein.
Ciao.
Ich war mal hier investiert und bin zu guten Kursen wieder raus.
Habe überlegt, steige aber aufgrund des Umfelds nicht mehr ein.
Ciao.
20.02.09 11:14
#2359
nedfuller
Rechnen ist doof
Habe gerade gesehen, daß Quest um sage und schreibe 7845,88% steigen muß, damit ich auf meinen durchschnittlichen Einstiegskurs komme...
Dann hoffen wir mal.
Dann hoffen wir mal.
20.02.09 11:24
#2360
Hedodd
viertausend an einem tag
...waren schon mal drin, glaube ich. also immer schön optimistisch bleiben...:-)))
20.02.09 23:20
#2361
heshes
SEC Filings for QMLM.OB Form 8-K on 20-Feb-2009
Form 8-K for QUEST MINERALS & MINING CORP
20-Feb-2009
Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant, Financial Statements
Item 4.01 Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant.
Previous independent registered public accounting firm
On February 13, 2009, we dismissed Kempisty & Company as our independent accountants, and we have engaged RBSM, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.
The reports of Kempisty & Company on our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor were such reports qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that the accountant's reports of Kempisty & Company on our financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 stated that (a) we are a defendant in several lawsuits, one of our significant subsidiaries is in bankruptcy, and that an adverse ruling could result in the loss of our operating assets, and (b) we have incurred operating losses since inception, require additional capital to continue operations, we could lose all of our operating assets through current and/or pending litigation, and that conditions raise substantial doubt about our Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
The decision to change accountants from Kempisty & Company to RBSM, LLP was approved by our board of directors.
During our fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 and the subsequent interim period through February 13, 2009, the date of the dismissal of Kempisty & Company, we did not have any disagreement with Kempisty & Company on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure.
During that time, there were no "reportable events" as set forth in Item 304(a)(1) of Regulation S-K adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, except that the accountant's reports of Kempisty & Company on our financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 stated that (a) we are a defendant in several lawsuits, one of our significant subsidiaries is in bankruptcy, and that an adverse ruling could result in the loss of our operating assets, and (b) we have incurred operating losses since inception, require additional capital to continue operations, we could lose all of our operating assets through current and/or pending litigation, and that conditions raise substantial doubt about our Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
We have provided Kempisty & Company with a copy of this report prior to its filing with the Commission.
New independent registered public accounting firm
On February 13, 2009 (the "Engagement Date"), the Company engaged RBSM LLP ("RBSM ") as its independent registered public accounting firm for the Company's fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. The decision to engage RBSM as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm was approved by the Company's Board of Directors.
During the two most recent fiscal years and through the February 13, 2009, the Company has not consulted with RBSM regarding either:
1. the application of accounting principles to any specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements, and neither a written report was provided to the Company nor oral advice was provided that RBSM concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or
2. any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K and the related instructions thereto) or a reportable event (as described in paragraph (a)(1)(v) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K).
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(c) Exhibits.
Exhibit No. Description
----------- -----------------------------------------
16.1 Letter on Change in Certifying Accountant
(to be filed by amendment)
20-Feb-2009
Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant, Financial Statements
Item 4.01 Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant.
Previous independent registered public accounting firm
On February 13, 2009, we dismissed Kempisty & Company as our independent accountants, and we have engaged RBSM, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.
The reports of Kempisty & Company on our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor were such reports qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that the accountant's reports of Kempisty & Company on our financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 stated that (a) we are a defendant in several lawsuits, one of our significant subsidiaries is in bankruptcy, and that an adverse ruling could result in the loss of our operating assets, and (b) we have incurred operating losses since inception, require additional capital to continue operations, we could lose all of our operating assets through current and/or pending litigation, and that conditions raise substantial doubt about our Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
The decision to change accountants from Kempisty & Company to RBSM, LLP was approved by our board of directors.
During our fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 and the subsequent interim period through February 13, 2009, the date of the dismissal of Kempisty & Company, we did not have any disagreement with Kempisty & Company on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure.
During that time, there were no "reportable events" as set forth in Item 304(a)(1) of Regulation S-K adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, except that the accountant's reports of Kempisty & Company on our financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 stated that (a) we are a defendant in several lawsuits, one of our significant subsidiaries is in bankruptcy, and that an adverse ruling could result in the loss of our operating assets, and (b) we have incurred operating losses since inception, require additional capital to continue operations, we could lose all of our operating assets through current and/or pending litigation, and that conditions raise substantial doubt about our Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
We have provided Kempisty & Company with a copy of this report prior to its filing with the Commission.
New independent registered public accounting firm
On February 13, 2009 (the "Engagement Date"), the Company engaged RBSM LLP ("RBSM ") as its independent registered public accounting firm for the Company's fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. The decision to engage RBSM as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm was approved by the Company's Board of Directors.
During the two most recent fiscal years and through the February 13, 2009, the Company has not consulted with RBSM regarding either:
1. the application of accounting principles to any specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements, and neither a written report was provided to the Company nor oral advice was provided that RBSM concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or
2. any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K and the related instructions thereto) or a reportable event (as described in paragraph (a)(1)(v) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K).
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(c) Exhibits.
Exhibit No. Description
----------- -----------------------------------------
16.1 Letter on Change in Certifying Accountant
(to be filed by amendment)
24.02.09 12:08
#2362
heshes
Form 8-K/A for QUEST MINERALS & MINING CORP
Form 8-K/A for QUEST MINERALS & MINING CORP
24-Feb-2009
Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant, Financial Statement
Item 4.01 Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant.
Previous independent registered public accounting firm
On February 13, 2009, we dismissed Kempisty & Company as our independent accountants, and we have engaged RBSM, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.
The reports of Kempisty & Company on our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor were such reports qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that the accountant's reports of Kempisty & Company on our financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 stated that (a) we are a defendant in several lawsuits, one of our significant subsidiaries is in bankruptcy, and that an adverse ruling could result in the loss of our operating assets, and (b) we have incurred operating losses since inception, require additional capital to continue operations, we could lose all of our operating assets through current and/or pending litigation, and that conditions raise substantial doubt about our Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
The decision to change accountants from Kempisty & Company to RBSM, LLP was approved by our board of directors.
During our fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 and the subsequent interim period through February 13, 2009, the date of the dismissal of Kempisty & Company, we did not have any disagreement with Kempisty & Company on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure.
During that time, there were no "reportable events" as set forth in Item 304(a)(1) of Regulation S-K adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, except that the accountant's reports of Kempisty & Company on our financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 stated that (a) we are a defendant in several lawsuits, one of our significant subsidiaries is in bankruptcy, and that an adverse ruling could result in the loss of our operating assets, and (b) we have incurred operating losses since inception, require additional capital to continue operations, we could lose all of our operating assets through current and/or pending litigation, and that conditions raise substantial doubt about our Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
We have provided Kempisty & Company with a copy of this report prior to its filing with the Commission. Kempisty & Company has provided a letter to us, dated February 23, 2009 and addressed to the Commission, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 16.1 and is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
New independent registered public accounting firm
On February 13, 2009 (the "Engagement Date"), the Company engaged RBSM LLP ("RBSM ") as its independent registered public accounting firm for the Company's fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. The decision to engage RBSM as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm was approved by the Company's Board of Directors.
During the two most recent fiscal years and through the February 13, 2009, the Company has not consulted with RBSM regarding either:
1. the application of accounting principles to any specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements, and neither a written report was provided to the Company nor oral advice was provided that RBSM concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or
2. any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K and the related instructions thereto) or a reportable event (as described in paragraph (a)(1)(v) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K).
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(c) Exhibits.
Exhibit No. Description
----------- -----------------------------------------
16.1 Letter on Change in Certifying Accountant
24-Feb-2009
Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant, Financial Statement
Item 4.01 Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant.
Previous independent registered public accounting firm
On February 13, 2009, we dismissed Kempisty & Company as our independent accountants, and we have engaged RBSM, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.
The reports of Kempisty & Company on our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor were such reports qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that the accountant's reports of Kempisty & Company on our financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 stated that (a) we are a defendant in several lawsuits, one of our significant subsidiaries is in bankruptcy, and that an adverse ruling could result in the loss of our operating assets, and (b) we have incurred operating losses since inception, require additional capital to continue operations, we could lose all of our operating assets through current and/or pending litigation, and that conditions raise substantial doubt about our Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
The decision to change accountants from Kempisty & Company to RBSM, LLP was approved by our board of directors.
During our fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 and the subsequent interim period through February 13, 2009, the date of the dismissal of Kempisty & Company, we did not have any disagreement with Kempisty & Company on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure.
During that time, there were no "reportable events" as set forth in Item 304(a)(1) of Regulation S-K adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, except that the accountant's reports of Kempisty & Company on our financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 stated that (a) we are a defendant in several lawsuits, one of our significant subsidiaries is in bankruptcy, and that an adverse ruling could result in the loss of our operating assets, and (b) we have incurred operating losses since inception, require additional capital to continue operations, we could lose all of our operating assets through current and/or pending litigation, and that conditions raise substantial doubt about our Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
We have provided Kempisty & Company with a copy of this report prior to its filing with the Commission. Kempisty & Company has provided a letter to us, dated February 23, 2009 and addressed to the Commission, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 16.1 and is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
New independent registered public accounting firm
On February 13, 2009 (the "Engagement Date"), the Company engaged RBSM LLP ("RBSM ") as its independent registered public accounting firm for the Company's fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. The decision to engage RBSM as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm was approved by the Company's Board of Directors.
During the two most recent fiscal years and through the February 13, 2009, the Company has not consulted with RBSM regarding either:
1. the application of accounting principles to any specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements, and neither a written report was provided to the Company nor oral advice was provided that RBSM concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or
2. any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K and the related instructions thereto) or a reportable event (as described in paragraph (a)(1)(v) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K).
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(c) Exhibits.
Exhibit No. Description
----------- -----------------------------------------
16.1 Letter on Change in Certifying Accountant
27.02.09 21:42
#2364
sammy4358
heshes weißt Du was neues?
KEMPISTY & COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS, P.C.
--------------------------------------------------
15 MAIDEN LANE - SUITE 1003 - NEW YORK, NY 10038
TEL (212) 406-7CPA (7272) - FAX (212) 513-1930
February 23, 2009
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Gentlemen:
We have read Item 4.01 of Form 8-K dated February 23, 2009 of Quest Minerals &
Mining Corp. and are in agreement with the statements contained therein as it
pertains to our firm.
We have no basis to agree or disagree with any other statements of the
Registrant contained in item 4.01.
Sincerely,
/s/ Kempisty & Company CPAs PC
-----------------------------------------
Kempisty & Company
Certified Public Accounts, P.C.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS, P.C.
--------------------------------------------------
15 MAIDEN LANE - SUITE 1003 - NEW YORK, NY 10038
TEL (212) 406-7CPA (7272) - FAX (212) 513-1930
February 23, 2009
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Gentlemen:
We have read Item 4.01 of Form 8-K dated February 23, 2009 of Quest Minerals &
Mining Corp. and are in agreement with the statements contained therein as it
pertains to our firm.
We have no basis to agree or disagree with any other statements of the
Registrant contained in item 4.01.
Sincerely,
/s/ Kempisty & Company CPAs PC
-----------------------------------------
Kempisty & Company
Certified Public Accounts, P.C.
03.03.09 11:27
#2366
heshes
Average Weekly Coal Commodity Spot Prices
Average Weekly Coal Commodity Spot Prices (Dollars per Short Ton)
| Week Ended | Central Appalachia 12,500 Btu, 1.2 SO2 | Northern Appalachia 13,000 Btu, <3.0 SO2 | Illinois Basin 11,800 Btu, 5.0 SO2 | Powder River Basin 8,800 Btu, 0.8 SO2 | Uinta Basin 11,700 Btu, 0.8 SO2 |
| 1/16/09 | $66.45 | $76.00 | $60.00 | $13.00 | $73.00 |
| 1/23/09 | $66.45 | $69.00 | $60.00 | $13.00 | $73.00 |
| 1/30/09 | $66.45 | $69.00 | $55.00 | $13.00 | $73.00 |
| 2/06/09 | $66.45 | $66.00 | $55.00 | $13.00 | $73.00 |
| 2/13/09 | $68.20 | $66.00 | $55.00 | $13.00 | $73.00 |
| 2/20/09 | $68.20 | $66.00 | $55.00 | $13.00 | $73.00 |
| 2/27/09 | $68.20 | $66.00 | $55.00 | $13.00 | $73.00 |
Source: Coal News and Markets
03.03.09 11:57
#2367
heshes
Feb 2009: Total Share Volume 304,040,880
schade, hier wurden die HTML-Restriktion verschärft - sodass eine schnelle Tabellen-Implementation nicht mehr gegeben ist :-( die Tabellen werden derart kastriert - dass diese nicht mehr übersichtlich sind. Schade, schade!
Feb 2009: Total Share Volume 304,040,880
Feb 2009: Total Share Volume 304,040,880
04.03.09 12:00
#2368
tobi_lein
Korrigiert mich bitte bzw. ...
... beantwortet mir mal meine Frage: Ist Quest tot oder kommt da irgendwenn noch was? Kann man unter A0M92C überhaupt noch irgendwas traden?
Ps. Bin schon ewig bei Ariva angemeldet, ist aber mein erstes Posting. Nehmt also bitte ein wenig Rücksicht ;-)
Ps. Bin schon ewig bei Ariva angemeldet, ist aber mein erstes Posting. Nehmt also bitte ein wenig Rücksicht ;-)
04.03.09 15:46
#2369
heshes
@tobi_lein - Dein Problem ist Deine alte WKN ;-)
ok, komische Frage - aber ich habe Gnade mit Dir ...
Deine genannte WKN ist seit letztem November tot (R/S + Symb-Wechsel ;-)
Es lebe folgendes:
QUEST MIN.+MNG NEW 11/08
WKN: A0RB98
ISIN: US74835X4007
Symbol: QMLM
Nun zu Deiner Frage ... alle die hier noch investiert sind - hoffen sicherlich noch darauf - dass etwas "kommt" ... zwischen dem 17. und 20. wird's spannend.
Aber zur Zeit würde ich mir zweimal überlegen - in QMLM neu zu investieren!
IMHO: Den mutigen gehört die Welt...
Hoffe geholfen zu haben ;-)
Deine genannte WKN ist seit letztem November tot (R/S + Symb-Wechsel ;-)
Es lebe folgendes:
QUEST MIN.+MNG NEW 11/08
WKN: A0RB98
ISIN: US74835X4007
Symbol: QMLM
Nun zu Deiner Frage ... alle die hier noch investiert sind - hoffen sicherlich noch darauf - dass etwas "kommt" ... zwischen dem 17. und 20. wird's spannend.
Aber zur Zeit würde ich mir zweimal überlegen - in QMLM neu zu investieren!
IMHO: Den mutigen gehört die Welt...
Hoffe geholfen zu haben ;-)
06.03.09 09:47
#2371
nedfuller
Doofe Frage(n)
Wir produzieren doch schon Kohle.
Warum dümpeln wir immer noch rum?
Welche Faktoren sprechen gegen einen Anstieg der Aktie. Nicht in ungeahnte, gierige Höhen, aber mehr als 0,001 müssen doch mal drin sein.
Nehmen wir mal an, dass alle Gerichtsverfahren gut verlaufen, was passiert dann?
Warum dümpeln wir immer noch rum?
Welche Faktoren sprechen gegen einen Anstieg der Aktie. Nicht in ungeahnte, gierige Höhen, aber mehr als 0,001 müssen doch mal drin sein.
Nehmen wir mal an, dass alle Gerichtsverfahren gut verlaufen, was passiert dann?
06.03.09 11:58
#2372
heshes
@nedfuller - Doofe Antwort(en) ;-) und UMFRAGE!
Hallo,
ich glaub' - wenn wir alle die Antworten wüssten - dann würde der Kurs nicht so am Boden liegen ;-)))
(Es gibt keine "doofe" Fragen - nur wiederholende Fragen - welche dann nerven!)
Ich hoffe - Du findest zwischen meinen doofen Antworten die nötigen Informationen :-))))
1 > Wir produzieren doch schon Kohle.
- Die Kohle muss nicht mehr produziert werden - die liegt seit ein paar 100 Jahren fertig im Berg ;-) ... aber ja - es wird Kohle abgebaut ... aber immer wieder mit auftretenden Problemen ... die es wohl nicht erlauben ... in so große Mengen zu produzieren - dass nicht mehr dilutiert (Geld durch Aktienausgabe) werden muss! Es fehlen uns einfach die genauen Einblicke - was wirklich in Pond Creek passiert! Ist so ähnlich wie - "fahr' auf der Autobahn mit 200km/h in eine Nebelbank... kann gut gehen - muss aber nicht!"
2 > Warum dümpeln wir immer noch rum?
- Keiner von uns weiss - was wirklich in Pond Creek gespielt wird. Uns fehlt die Basis des Vertrauens bei Quest. Handfeste Beweise müssen her ... unterstützt durch schwarze Zahlen, zumindest eine weitere stetige Umsatzsteigerung in den Monatsberichten.
3 > Welche Faktoren sprechen gegen einen Anstieg der Aktie. Nicht in ungeahnte, gierige Höhen, aber mehr als 0,001 müssen doch mal drin sein.
- Faktor Dilution - so niedriger der Preis - um so mehr muss dilutiert werden, damit die gewünschte Zielsumme erreicht wird. Das übersättigt IMHO die Nachfrage - der Preis sinkt.
- Faktor MarketMaker (MM) ... die spielen - wie sie wollen.
- Faktor Unsicherheit - wir wissen nicht - was gerade in Pond Creek passiert.
- Faktor Bashing - jede "negative Information" über Quest wird gierig aufgesogen und geglaubt ... jede "positive Information" mit Misstrauen abgewiesen und nicht geglaubt.
- usw.
4 > Nehmen wir mal an, dass alle Gerichtsverfahren gut verlaufen, was passiert dann?
- IMHO nicht viel ... weil die letzten positiven News von Quest schon nicht viel bewirkt haben und einfach nur in der Luft verpufft sind, weil eine solide/feste Grundlage/Basis von Quest fehlt. Zu viel ist in den letzten 24 Monaten kaputt gemacht worden.
Da ich ja stetig guter Hoffnung bin ... und immer noch an das Gute in Quest glaube ... vielleicht passiert ja in den nächsten 10 Tagen doch noch etwas unglaubliches - die Chancen stehen dazu 50/50 ... drückt einmal alle die Daumen und denkt "positiv" an Quest! ;-))))
Viele Grüße und ein entspanntes schönes Wochenende ...
Wie viele Personen interessieren sich eigentlich wirklich noch für Quest?!? So mehr positive Votings - um so eher setzen wir die unten genannten Punkt in die Realität um! Bei genug Votings - erhält dann jeder Voter von mir eine BM mit einer Registrierungsadresse für weitere Informationen! |
Was maulwurf und ich planen:
- Einen Fragenkatalog erstellen, welcher dem CEO vorgelegt und vom CEO beantwortet werden soll. Dazu werden dann alle Shareholder aufgerufen ihre Fragen schriftlich zu formulieren.
- Evtl. eine inoffizielle deutsche Telefonkonferenz zu/über Quest mit Informationen über den Stand der Ding sowie einem Frage- und Antwortspiel der Shareholder.
Dieser Aufwand lohnt nur - wenn es genug Personen überhaupt interessiert - ansonsten können wir uns den Aufwand ersparen und weiterhin nur für uns (maulwurf / heshes) die Informationen sammeln und damit wir unsere Meinung bilden können ;-)
06.03.09 15:37
#2373
nedfuller
@heshes
Nur 4 Bewertungen bisher.
a bisserl wenig. Aber vielleicht arbeiten noch alle.
Irgendjemand dieses Jahr im Urlaub in den Staaten? Könnte da ein netten Abstecher vorschlagen :)
a bisserl wenig. Aber vielleicht arbeiten noch alle.
Irgendjemand dieses Jahr im Urlaub in den Staaten? Könnte da ein netten Abstecher vorschlagen :)
07.03.09 18:33
#2374
sammy4358
@heshes
Hallo zusammen, leider kann ich nicht bewerten weil ich heshes schon 7 mal bewertet habe.
Komische Regel :-(
Aber wie immer sehr gutes Posting heshes.
Habe meinen Durchittskurs wieder verbilligt die letzten 6 Wochen. Ich glaub an Quest immernoch.
Schönes Wochenende @ all und wird schon gut gehen ;-))
Komische Regel :-(
Aber wie immer sehr gutes Posting heshes.
Habe meinen Durchittskurs wieder verbilligt die letzten 6 Wochen. Ich glaub an Quest immernoch.
Schönes Wochenende @ all und wird schon gut gehen ;-))
11.03.09 14:55
#2375
sammy4358
von qsplurge
A minor objection the the BK plan was filed yesterday.
http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/ibdBdf
http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/ibdBdf