Diese Aktie sollte man sich ansehen!
| eröffnet am: | 05.01.04 11:03 von: | Ca.Gouverneur |
| neuester Beitrag: | 08.01.04 10:40 von: | Ca.Gouverneur |
| Anzahl Beiträge: | 3 | |
| Leser gesamt: | 2565 | |
| davon Heute: | 1 | |
bewertet mit 0 Sternen |
||
|
|
||
05.01.04 11:03
#1
Ca.Gouverneur
Diese Aktie sollte man sich ansehen!
SECURITY TECHNOLOGY
For Global ID Systems, the Tried and True
By BARNABY J. FEDER
Published: December 29, 2003
he Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks ignited interest in more precise ways to identify people, particularly in the field of biometrics, which makes use of distinctive body features. Among the biometric techniques that have been explored are scanning eyes for individualized features of the retina or iris, using cameras and computers to map the distances between parts of the face, and studying the patterns of voice or gait.
Advertisement
But as governments complete initial testing and begin putting into place new security systems at border crossings and at sites like airports and embassies, there is a clear winner among the competing biometric technologies: the old-fashioned fingerprint.
"They are looking for proven technology that's stable and familiar," said Dr. Joseph J. Atick, president and chief executive of Identix, a leading supplier of biometric technology. "It's not about technology. It's about lowering your deployment risk."
Today's fingerprint systems are not ones that Eliot Ness would recognize. Equipment from Identix and similar companies does away with messy ink in favor of digital records, created by software when fingers are pressed against an electronic pad or a sensitive photoplate.
As often as not, fingerprints are being paired with one of the newer biometrics identification techniques. The use of more than one method makes it harder for people to escape detection by disguising their fingerprints, and helps identify the 15 percent or so of people whose hands are so worn or scarred that prints are hard to capture.
The most frequent complement to fingerprinting is likely to be facial recognition, where early leaders like Identix and Viisage are now facing competition from start-ups like A4Vision, Geometrix and 3DBiometrics, which employ more detailed, three-dimensional images.
The Department of Homeland Security has decided to require fingerprints and facial images on the documents of all foreign nationals who come to the United States from the 27 nations that are exempt from visa requirements. Most of them are in Western Europe. The department's United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology program, known as U.S.-Visit, is to begin operating next month and go into effect in American airports during the year.
The State Department has begun using the same combination of technologies at more than 200 embassies, and the international standards-setting agency for airlines has adopted it as a voluntary worldwide standard. But work and testing continues on competing biometrics, like iris scanning, where the newest devices use invisible infrared light rather than the laser beams that made some users nervous.
A growing number of people will carry their identifying data on microchips in passports, employment ID cards or drivers' licenses in 2004, analysts say. But the data is useless unless the technologies and public records are integrated, a job that has become a fast-growing business for data processing giants like I.B.M., Unisys and Siemens. "The technology is advancing rapidly," said Ed Schaffner, director of positive ID and access control solutions at Unisys, who said that the first government agencies to adopt the technology would put their systems in place in 2004. "The big growth will be in 2005 and 2006," he said.
IDNX sollte auf der Watchlist nicht fehlen. Eskimato was gibts es neues zu EDGR?
For Global ID Systems, the Tried and True
By BARNABY J. FEDER
Published: December 29, 2003
he Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks ignited interest in more precise ways to identify people, particularly in the field of biometrics, which makes use of distinctive body features. Among the biometric techniques that have been explored are scanning eyes for individualized features of the retina or iris, using cameras and computers to map the distances between parts of the face, and studying the patterns of voice or gait.
Advertisement
But as governments complete initial testing and begin putting into place new security systems at border crossings and at sites like airports and embassies, there is a clear winner among the competing biometric technologies: the old-fashioned fingerprint.
"They are looking for proven technology that's stable and familiar," said Dr. Joseph J. Atick, president and chief executive of Identix, a leading supplier of biometric technology. "It's not about technology. It's about lowering your deployment risk."
Today's fingerprint systems are not ones that Eliot Ness would recognize. Equipment from Identix and similar companies does away with messy ink in favor of digital records, created by software when fingers are pressed against an electronic pad or a sensitive photoplate.
As often as not, fingerprints are being paired with one of the newer biometrics identification techniques. The use of more than one method makes it harder for people to escape detection by disguising their fingerprints, and helps identify the 15 percent or so of people whose hands are so worn or scarred that prints are hard to capture.
The most frequent complement to fingerprinting is likely to be facial recognition, where early leaders like Identix and Viisage are now facing competition from start-ups like A4Vision, Geometrix and 3DBiometrics, which employ more detailed, three-dimensional images.
The Department of Homeland Security has decided to require fingerprints and facial images on the documents of all foreign nationals who come to the United States from the 27 nations that are exempt from visa requirements. Most of them are in Western Europe. The department's United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology program, known as U.S.-Visit, is to begin operating next month and go into effect in American airports during the year.
The State Department has begun using the same combination of technologies at more than 200 embassies, and the international standards-setting agency for airlines has adopted it as a voluntary worldwide standard. But work and testing continues on competing biometrics, like iris scanning, where the newest devices use invisible infrared light rather than the laser beams that made some users nervous.
A growing number of people will carry their identifying data on microchips in passports, employment ID cards or drivers' licenses in 2004, analysts say. But the data is useless unless the technologies and public records are integrated, a job that has become a fast-growing business for data processing giants like I.B.M., Unisys and Siemens. "The technology is advancing rapidly," said Ed Schaffner, director of positive ID and access control solutions at Unisys, who said that the first government agencies to adopt the technology would put their systems in place in 2004. "The big growth will be in 2005 and 2006," he said.
IDNX sollte auf der Watchlist nicht fehlen. Eskimato was gibts es neues zu EDGR?
05.01.04 11:15
#2
Ca.Gouverneur
Hier wichtiges zu Biometrie
http://biometrie.inhos.de/
08.01.04 10:40
#3
Ca.Gouverneur
Smile, You're in America
By Bill Mann (TMF Otter)
January 5, 2004
The Department of Homeland Security launched its US VISIT program today. US VISIT, which stands for U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology, requires that each foreign visitor be fingerprinted and photographed upon entry to (and eventually upon departure from) the United States. US VISIT will be implemented at more than 50 land crossings between the U.S. and its neighbors by the end of this year. The total expenditure approved by Congress for the program exceeds $330 million in 2004.
The participation in this program by Homeland Security should tell you something obvious about US VISIT: It's designed to help track the comings and goings of the hundreds of thousands of international visitors to the United States. Many experts consider the government's failure to do this more rigorously in the past has left the country more vulnerable to terrorist attacks such as the one that took place on Sept. 11, 2001. Homeland Security believes that the process will add no more than 15 to 20 seconds to the time it requires to process each passenger at border controls.
A Minneapolis company, Identix (Nasdaq: IDNX), which makes identification systems that use fingerprints and other biological data, should logically be expected to garner substantial business from US VISIT. And with annual revenues below $100 million, substantial participation by Identix would be nothing short of a home run for the company's investors. Identix boasts of some contract wins in the past year, including the United Kingdom's Passport Office Nationwide Identity Pilot Program as a subcontractor to Schlumberger (NYSE: SLB). The company also recently announced that it was selling its products to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Well, they called it a "state," but I'm fussy that way.
Identix also happens to be one of the most heavily shorted companies on any of the American exchanges. The reasons why are myriad, and start with years of phenomenal cash burn and operating losses as well as a history of substantial shareholder dilution and overpromising/underdelivering by management.
As Jeff Fischer noted in a recent article, "[g]iven the world's intense focus on security, you would think a firm that provides fingerprinting and face recognition technology would be bulletproof." Yes, you would. Instead, the company announced reduced earnings due to revenue recognition delays late last month. Perhaps more shockingly, Identix' CFO Erik Prusch, suddenly resigned to "relocate with his family to the West Coast" (text courtesy of CCBN).
The skeptic in me MUST ask this question: If you're in a top position in a company that seems to be in the sweet spot in an industry under heavy demand by our (and other) governments, do you just up and leave right at the moment things ought to be getting good?
I don't have an answer here, but if I were a shareholder, I sure as heck wouldn't like the question, either. It makes no sense -- executives simply do not DO such a thing.
US VISIT's facilities in place starting today are temporary. Homeland Security has just released a request for proposals for more permanent solutions. If Identix is selected later this year for the long-term implementation, certainly it will play well in Minneapolis.
January 5, 2004
The Department of Homeland Security launched its US VISIT program today. US VISIT, which stands for U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology, requires that each foreign visitor be fingerprinted and photographed upon entry to (and eventually upon departure from) the United States. US VISIT will be implemented at more than 50 land crossings between the U.S. and its neighbors by the end of this year. The total expenditure approved by Congress for the program exceeds $330 million in 2004.
The participation in this program by Homeland Security should tell you something obvious about US VISIT: It's designed to help track the comings and goings of the hundreds of thousands of international visitors to the United States. Many experts consider the government's failure to do this more rigorously in the past has left the country more vulnerable to terrorist attacks such as the one that took place on Sept. 11, 2001. Homeland Security believes that the process will add no more than 15 to 20 seconds to the time it requires to process each passenger at border controls.
A Minneapolis company, Identix (Nasdaq: IDNX), which makes identification systems that use fingerprints and other biological data, should logically be expected to garner substantial business from US VISIT. And with annual revenues below $100 million, substantial participation by Identix would be nothing short of a home run for the company's investors. Identix boasts of some contract wins in the past year, including the United Kingdom's Passport Office Nationwide Identity Pilot Program as a subcontractor to Schlumberger (NYSE: SLB). The company also recently announced that it was selling its products to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Well, they called it a "state," but I'm fussy that way.
Identix also happens to be one of the most heavily shorted companies on any of the American exchanges. The reasons why are myriad, and start with years of phenomenal cash burn and operating losses as well as a history of substantial shareholder dilution and overpromising/underdelivering by management.
As Jeff Fischer noted in a recent article, "[g]iven the world's intense focus on security, you would think a firm that provides fingerprinting and face recognition technology would be bulletproof." Yes, you would. Instead, the company announced reduced earnings due to revenue recognition delays late last month. Perhaps more shockingly, Identix' CFO Erik Prusch, suddenly resigned to "relocate with his family to the West Coast" (text courtesy of CCBN).
The skeptic in me MUST ask this question: If you're in a top position in a company that seems to be in the sweet spot in an industry under heavy demand by our (and other) governments, do you just up and leave right at the moment things ought to be getting good?
I don't have an answer here, but if I were a shareholder, I sure as heck wouldn't like the question, either. It makes no sense -- executives simply do not DO such a thing.
US VISIT's facilities in place starting today are temporary. Homeland Security has just released a request for proposals for more permanent solutions. If Identix is selected later this year for the long-term implementation, certainly it will play well in Minneapolis.
